But I guess I'm what I feel and see and hear, Harlem, I hear you: hear you, hear me -- we two -- you, me, talk on this page. (I hear New York too.) Me -- who?
Friday, August 29, 2014
Feeling Things Hard Enough
When we are born, we don't usually actively question our place in society or where society has placed us. As we grow older, however, we become increasingly aware of our position in relation to our peers and the rest of the world. We start to recognize the ways in which we are privileged and the ways in which we might be at a disadvantage -- more often, we see most clearly what others possess that we do not. It is not too difficult to articulate these observations. Observations like: I can walk and she can't. My father earns more money than his does. I am sicker than them. In Native Son by Richard Wright, Bigger is able to articulate his observations of the unequal position society has pushed him into clearly enough when he says to Gus, "...Every time I think about it I feel like somebody's poking a red-hot iron down my throat. Godammit, look! We live here and they live there. We black and they white. They got things and we ain't. They do things and we can't..." Of all the injustice in his life, Bigger is astutely aware. What is difficult for Bigger to articulate then, is the "somebody" that is forcing the iron down his throat, and the meaning of the burning sensation. He does not know exactly what or who to blame especially since some of the white people he encounters all claim to be on his side in some mixed up way. Perhaps it would be easier for him if he did know so that his fear would not be so aimless. Maybe if he believed in a God, he could hold him accountable for every aspect of his life and believe that circumstances are out of his hands. What makes the fear and anger that perpetually consumes Bigger so toxic is how similar it is to a chronic disease with an unknown cure. The fear that cannot be articulated lives there in the pit of his stomach -- yet that fear can't always be at the front of his mind, he must get up, eat, walk, go get a job -- all the while knowing none of these acts will resolve the tension underneath it at all. What makes Bigger unique from his friends and family is that there is a part of him that wants to act but knows not how, believing a bit of control may be within his reach -- but at what point do we accept something as hopeless, inexplicable, and just something we have to live with? At what point do we decide thinking about some unjust situation is pointless and that it is far better to get drunk and sleep it off? For some reason, even though Bigger handles his circumstances differently than his friends and family, I feel that in a paradoxical way, Bigger is ultimately reduced to the same sort of tragic acceptance as them. One of the lines that struck me the most is what Bigger says to Max towards the end of the novel: "...I didn't know I was really alive in this world until I felt things hard enough to kill for 'em..." There is a freedom in giving up. It isn't true freedom but is at the very least a twisted relief in freeing yourself from not only other peoples' expectations but from your old expectations of yourself. Though Bigger believes he has reached a state of enlightenment, when it comes down to it, Bigger did not kill Mary or Bessie for intentions beyond survival but the exhilaration and deluded understanding he felt was a result of the release from the predestined path he seemed to have laid out for him. With his tension pushed to the point of exhaustion, his ultimate form of acceptance is not so different from Bessie living for the deluded numbness of alcohol.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Nice post, I definitely agree with the distinction you make about which level of articulation Bigger has of the injustices around him. He feels the anger and burning hatred toward the hazy mass of never-ending wrongs in his life, but he doesn't know how to react or what exactly to blame it all on. Yet at the same time, we really do know the specifics of how he goes about his thinking process, and this is because of the narrator. Personally, I really like the way Wright employs the narrative voice, it has the perfect blend of insight into Bigger's mind without getting in the way or closing the book from interpretation. We know how Bigger thinks, even though Bigger does not, and I find this extremely fascinating. And once Bigger has his moments of understanding with Max towards the end of the novel, he understands himself almost as much as the reader does.
ReplyDeleteYou write with a beautiful, flowing, even rhythmic style and I love the contrast of Bigger's harsh but accurate articulation of his oppression against his inarticulable, nameless, oppressors. Ignorant of his enemy, Bigger has no specific direction for all his pent-up anger and frustration. This almost reminds me of philosophy, with a difficult, even futile battle against shadows. Without an avenue of release and only temporarily suppressed by Bigger's self-distraction (is that the right word? I'm referring to the alcohol, sex, violence, etc.) the pressure continually builds up until finally it bursts forth from his self-imposed dam in a torrent of roiling hatred and violence.
ReplyDeleteAfter rereading that part of your post a couple of times, I can begin to see what you mean about Bigger being "reduced to the same state of tragic acceptance as [his family]": Bigger deludes himself into thinking he has freed himself (through the murder vs. through religion, etc.) and in a weird sort of way, this is a subconscious acceptance of his circumstances. Maybe that's not quite right, and I'm sorry for that-- not all of us are as skilled writers as you-- but I can definitely find the truth in your words. Lovely post.
They way you talked about freedom in giving up reminds of "The World I See" by Mari Evans -- the poem that we talked about in class on Friday. It's interesting that you use the word freedom, given that freedom is what the whole Civil Rights movement was fighting for, and what Wright was fighting for when he wrote the novel. Freedom is what Bigger desires above all else, but being unable to really apply his desires into something constructive, he can never real achieve this. Instead, he has to settle for a lesser form of freedom. Though I suppose you could consider Bigger's death the only time he was ever truly free in his life.
ReplyDeleteI agree that Bigger killed Mary and Bessie only by accident and out of necessity, respectively, but I think the affirmation he felt came after the accident. I don't think it was pre-determined, but after the fact, when he sees that he is capable of this, he is able to realize that he has more freedom than he originally thought.
ReplyDeleteAlthough you make a good point of the murders being just a form of escape rather than freedom. I guess I think of it more as a freeing thing because we only get insight into Bigger's mind and I as a person usually side with the protagonist.
The distinction you're making between the murder as an escape from his situation vs. murder as self-realization comes in at the very end of the book and then it just ends and isn't very well addressed in the novel which I thought was kind of weird because its such a massively important part of the book. But anyway I enjoyed this post because I never thought of the murder as a form of escape but that totally makes sense. I wrote a post on this on my blog, if you want a more comprehensive and coherent version of my take on this.
Bigger seems to fear the unknown, not being able to do anything, the feeling of powerlessness seems to drive him to do impulsive things. If Bigger had some feeling of belonging or purpose, I feel that Bigger would have went down a much more different path of life.
ReplyDelete